tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1843193020550922792.post2152078744197637757..comments2023-10-23T09:59:06.101-07:00Comments on Geoengineering Politics: First Binational CO2 Storage Standard ReleasedJosh Hortonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16119913240229321280noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1843193020550922792.post-12899679329858937132012-11-24T10:20:42.840-08:002012-11-24T10:20:42.840-08:00I found a draft of this standard. It leaves the q...I found a <a href="http://ebookbrowse.com/csa-z741-geological-storage-of-carbon-dioxide-pdf-d342754995" rel="nofollow">draft</a> of this standard. It leaves the question of how long the CO2 is supposed to stay in the ground up to the political jurisdiction that adopts the standard. <br /><br />Texas says .001% per year leakage is all that can be allowed. In his book <i>Capturing Carbon</i> Mills suggests .01% per year makes sense. He calls the Texas standard "excessive". <br /><br />I would have thought a prime reason to have a standard is to set a reasonable target for how long stored CO2 has to stay in the ground in order to be called sequestered. david lewishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01057820755734099375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1843193020550922792.post-35534712366895318632012-11-24T10:15:24.324-08:002012-11-24T10:15:24.324-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.david lewishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01057820755734099375noreply@blogger.com